
Cymbeline
By William Shakespeare
Program Notes
I was afforded a choice between two
shows to direct this season, and the decision was easy, once
I had read Cymbeline . The opportunity to direct
a rarely-produced play with such rich language, entertaining
characters, and as many “undiscovered countries” as Cymbeline
had to offer was not to be resisted.
Cymbeline
is one of the last five plays Shakespeare wrote. Dated 1609
or 1610, it is considered his early experiment in a new genre
of plays now termed “The Romances”. Preceded by Pericles
in 1607, Shakespeare's work in this form culminated in
The Winter's Tale in 1610 and in his masterpiece,
The Tempest in 1611. All of these plays embrace
elements of comedy and tragedy and all have similar motifs:
families reunited after separation and suffering; recognition
scenes in which characters re-encounter each other in a state
of wonder; oracles, dreams, revelations, and gods; the finding
or re-claiming of one's self.
The main plot of Cymbeline
is one with which Elizabethan audiences would have been
very familiar: a man wagers on his lover's chastity and is
fooled, he orders her death (which is prevented by wise and
faithful servant), and is finally reunited with her. It had
been popular for centuries in various forms and languages.
The most popular version Shakespeare drew from when writing
Cymbeline was Boccaccio's Decameron , also
a minor source for The Winter's Tale .
There are many important
themes explored in the play; Appearance vs. Reality; The Restorative
Power of Nature vs. the Oppressive Court ; Forgiveness and
Reconciliation; the influence of the divine. All are delicately
and interwoven throughout, and days could be spent exploring
just one. The theme of Appearance vs. Reality, for example,
abounds, for in Cymbeline , nothing is as it seems,
and almost anything can happen. Equal time could be spent
on exploring the play's similarities to the style of the fairy-tale.
In Cymbeline we are given sundered lovers, a wicked
step-mother and sleeping potion—and that is just the first
scene.
Like Snow White
, Imogen, the heroine of Cymbeline , is forced
from home by a step-mother, takes refuge with mysterious strangers,
and becomes their housekeeper. She endures a virtual death
through the afore-mentioned potion, and is finally reunited
with her handsome lover. Though Snow White was not
written down until the 18 th century, its resemblances to
Cymbeline are uncanny and have caused speculation
that the story was in oral circulation for centuries before.
Attention is often
drawn to the amount of favorite and “re-cycled” plot devices
Shakespeare employed in the writing of the play (a kind of
Shakespearean-greatest-hits), including long-lost sons, a
cross-dressing maiden, mistaken identities, and a banished
lover. The language has been called rich but “often clumsy,”
leading a number of critics to hypothesize that Shakespeare
collaborated with a less-talented playwright.
Some feel that in Cymbeline
, Shakespeare was creating a mere pastiche of his previous
work, a self-parody of sorts. I disagree.
When one experiences the play as a
whole, one not only witnesses some of Shakespeare's most beautiful
writing, but becomes a participant in a myriad of human journeys
drawn from his lifetime of experience and painted with the
personalities of all the characters in his canon.
Regardless of one's
thoughts on the play; whether it is fully Shakespeare, or
whether it is one of his greater or lesser works, one cannot
deny the beauty of the play's ultimately positive outlook
on the universe: it demonstrates that despite everything that
goes wrong in our lives—the struggles we endure, the sadness—things
often have a way of working out in the end. The good triumph
over the wicked, and those who have suffered greatly can be
happy again. We can right wrongs, overcome obstacles and be
re-united, reconciled and forgiven, even by those against
whom we have committed the worst offenses.
Life may sometimes
seem to run off course, but as the good servant Pisanio says:
Fortune
brings in some boats that are not steered…
— Joe Discher
* *
*
“Cymbeline is one of
Shakespeare's longest and richest plays. It's capaciousness
is its great virtue. It ranges from the nightmare claustrophobia
of Imogen's bedroom to the epic violence of the Romano-British
battle; it juxtaposes the innocent prude Posthumus, the refined
brute Cloten, and the non-chalant hero Guiderius. It accommodates
Iachimo's corrosive cynicism and Jupiter's transcendental
affirmations…The Victorian critics who supposed the ageing
Shakespeare was writing in a mood of philosophic calm or catatonic
boredom could scarcely have been more mistaken. Cymbeline
was produced by a dramatist working at the height of
his powers.” —Martin Butler
“Its variety of characters
and tonalities—comic or tragic, realistic or fantastic—are
all reconciled in a positive and unifying vision. The comic
is never farcical, and the potentially tragic remains merely
potential. The realistic does not preclude abstraction, and
the elements of romance do not give way an entirely escapist
retreat form reality. Cymbeline thus suggests and
attempts to demonstrate…a vision of human weakness transcended.”
—Charles Boyce, Shakespeare A to Z
From Shakespeare:
The Invention of the Human , by Harold Bloom:
“There is no way, one
might think, that Posthumus is salvageable, though Shakespeare
insouciantly does not care. Meredith Skura, in a brilliant
application of psychoanalysis to the play's dilemmas, argues
that Posthumus cannot find himself as a husband until he gets
back to himself as a son, in relation to his lost family,
available to him only in a dream-like vision. As Skura notes,
identities are very unstable in Cymbeline , perhaps
more than elsewhere in Shakespeare. “The exaggerated complications
in Cymbeline make us realize with even more force
than usual that ‘reality' finally lies in the enrichment,
and truth lies in the excess.”
“A difficult play to
stage, at least in our time, Cymbeline puzzles as
frequently as it enchants.”
“Part of the fascination
of Cymbeline is the readers (and playgoer's) sense
that something is wayward about this drama; it will not abide
a steady contemplation. One cannot be certain that it behaves
like a play; the plot is chaos, and Shakespeare never bothers
to be probable…perhaps Shakespeare was in a contrary mood
and decided that this time he would please himself, and yet
others were then pleased as well…”
|